Russia warns U.S. is adding fuel to fire with long-range missile decision

The U.S. decision to allow Ukraine limited use of long-range missiles for strikes within Russian territory marks a major shift in its involvement in the conflict, prompting sharp criticism from Russia and raising concerns about escalating tensions.

The U.S. decision to allow Ukraine limited use of American-made long-range missiles for strikes within Russian territory has drawn sharp criticism from the Kremlin. Russian officials view this as a significant escalation in U.S. involvement in the war, which has persisted since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov accused the U.S. of "adding fuel to the fire" and raising tensions, while Russian President Vladimir Putin has previously warned that such actions could be interpreted as NATO's direct participation in the conflict.

This policy reversal comes amid significant developments in the conflict. Ukraine has recently faced intensified Russian attacks and the arrival of North Korean troops supporting Moscow. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has reiterated the need for robust defensive and offensive measures, asserting that eliminating Russia's capacity for attacks is essential. He emphasized that Ukraine's actions, supported by international partners, are a matter of justice and defense against aggression.

Analysts from the Institute for the Study of War suggest the limited authorization may not significantly alter battlefield dynamics. While Ukraine could target military objects within certain Russian regions, extensive restrictions on long-range weapons use may continue to provide Russian forces with sanctuaries. Experts argue that broader access to U.S. weaponry is necessary to fully disrupt Russia's military operations and ensure Ukraine's effective self-defense.

European nations have yet to determine their stance on mirroring the U.S. decision. EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell has advocated for enabling Ukraine to "hit the archers," emphasizing the importance of a proactive defense. As EU leaders meet to discuss the issue, uncertainty looms over whether Europe will align with Washington's shift, especially as political transitions in the U.S. approach with the election of Donald Trump, who has promised to resolve the war swiftly.

This development represents a potential turning point in the war, raising the stakes for all involved. Finnish lawmaker Tytti Tuppurainen highlighted the urgency for Europe to take responsibility for its security, calling the situation a wake-up call. The evolving dynamics underline the broader geopolitical implications, with the West facing critical decisions about its role in supporting Ukraine and countering Russian aggression.